The Document of the Period of the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547) from the Collection of Lamoignon (RGADA)

Gerasimova, E. S. Dokument perioda Schmal’kal’denskoy voyny iz kollektsii Lamuan’ona (RGADA) [The Document of the Period of the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547) from the Collection of Lamoignon (RGADA)], in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 210222.

Ekaterina Sergeevna Gerasimova, doctor of History, assistant professor, Chair of Archives at the Institute for History and Archives, Russian State University for the Humanities (109012, Rossiya, Moskva, Nikol’skaya ulitsa, 15)

Language: Russian

The publication presents a list of letters from the collection of Lamoignon reflecting events of the Schmalkaldic War in the Holy Roman Empire in 1546–1547. One of them, written by Sébastien de L’Aubespine to the king of France Francis I in January 1547, represents a valuable testimony on the military-political events around the siege of Leipzig, and reflects the point of view of French diplomacy on the situation in Germany during the Reformation and religious schism. The full text of the autograph is published with a translation into Russian and brief comments.

Key Words: Schmalkaldic War, Lamoignon collection, French Renaissance diplomacy, Duke Moritz of Saxony, Elector Johann Friedrich of Saxony

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-gerasimova/

Creative Commons License

Notes and Extracts from the Latin Manuscripts of the St. Petersburg Imperial Public Library

Dobiash-Rozhdestvenskaya, O. A. Zametki i izvlecheniya iz latinskikh rukopisey Sankt-Peterburgskoy Imperatorskoy Publichnoy Biblioteki [Notes and Extracts from the Latin Manuscripts of the St. Petersburg Imperial Public Library], in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 182209.

INITIALS SURNAME
orgName
address

Olga Anatol’evna Dobiash-Rozhdestvenskaya (1874–1939), corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences

Zinaida Andreevna Lurie, doctor of History, assistant lecturer, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Saint-Petersburg State University (199034, Rossiya, Sankt-Peterburg, Universitetskaia nab., 7/9)

Alexei Olegovich Medved, independent researcher (197341, Rossiya, Sankt-Peterburg, Fermskoe shosse, 36/27, apt. 29)

Vladimir Vladimirovich Shishkin, doctor of History, assistant professor, Institute of History, Saint-Petersburg State University (199034, Rossiya, Sankt-Peterburg, Mendeleevskaya liniya, 5)

Language: Russian

This publication contains an article written by O. A. Dobiash-Rozhdestvenskaya in 1914 and presenting the results of the work of her student paleographic seminar. The text doesn’t seem to have lost its scientific relevance. The stylistic and formal editing has been made, the reference tool has been expanded and provided with comments from the editor.

Key Words: history of Jerusalem, province, church cathedral, Bertholf Pilgrim, francs, Peter from Blois

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-dobiash/

Creative Commons License

Epicurean Detective. Stephen Greenblatt’s «The Swerve: How the World Became Modern»

Kovalev, V. A. Sledstvie ob Epikure: Retsenziya na monografiyu Stivena Grinblatta «Renessans: U istokov sovremennosti» [Epicurean Detective. Stephen Greenblatt’s «The Swerve: How the World Became Modern»], in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 169180.

Viktor Aleksandrovich Kovalev, doctor of History, assistant professor, Saint-Petersburg State University of the Humanities and Social Sciences (192238, Rossiya, Sankt-Peterburg, ulitsa Fuchika, 15)

Language: Russian

In the review of Stephen Greenblatt’s «The Swerve: How the World Became Modern» criticist argues that many of the monograph’s features are linked with neohistoricism pattern. It is apparent because author is one of neohistoricism patriarchs. Emphasis on the political and ideological aspect of historical events along with projection of author’s political prejudices frames all the scheme of the text. Reviewer points that the main theme of the monograph is author’s denying of postmodern concept of an «author’s death». Neither an author, nor the idea can not die, argues Greenblatt, because all things forgotten can return in the history of thoughts. Exemplified by the history of Epicureanism, this thesis runs like a golden thread through all substance of investigation. Along with this filled with humanistic pathos idea the key question of the scale of influence of the elite book-learned culture on the popular one remains unanswered by Greenblatt. Author sophisticatedly intertwines the storyline of Epicurean philosophy invention, oblivion and rediscovering in the Renaissance with historical, bookish, dramaturgical and even with his own biographical facts and events. But sometimes, as reviewer points, Greenblatt is unfair to the characters of his text blaming them in ideological imperfection. Also due to the concept of ideas’ immortality, he remains undiscovered a great part of historical process.

Key Words: neohistoricism, history of literature, the Renaissance, history of thoughts, Neomarxism, the early Modern history, history of the Middle ages, history of philosophy

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-kovalev/

Creative Commons License

Thirty Years War Interpreted by a Politologist

Prokopiev, A. Yu. Tridtsatiletnyaya voyna vzglyadom politologa [Thirty Years War Interpreted by a Politologist], in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 139168.

Andrey Yur’evich Prokopiev, doctor of History, professor, Institute of History, St. Petersburg State University (199034, Rossiya, Sankt-Peterburg, Mendeleevskaya liniya, 5)

Language: Russian

The article is dedicated to the book of the German political scientist Herfried Münkler, published on the anniversary of the beginning of the Thirty Years’ War with the author’s political science postulates being critically examined. Is it possible to see the Thirty Years’ War as the forerunner of modern «hybrid» and «asymmetric» wars? What are the lessons of this war for modernity and can we use the laws of modern political science to analyze the early modern times? Is the «interference» of modern sciences in the field of historical research academically correct? The work of the well-known German scholar’s is analyzed in accordance with historical approach, taking into account the latest literature devoted to the Thirty Years’ War. It is emphasized that the laws of political science, projected into the past, can hardly help to reconstruct the historical panorama of events. They only emerge further questions and doubts. For the successful argumentation of the theses, it is necessary to take into account the point of view of historians, specialized in a certain epoch.

Key Words: Thirty Years’ War, Holy Roman Empire, Peace of Westphalia, Habsburger, German Estates, asymmetrical and hybridical war, Early Modern period

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-prokopiev/

Creative Commons License

Personification of the Reformation in the 18th century

Richter, S.
Personifikatsiya Reformatsii v XVIII v. [Personification of the Reformation in the 18th century], in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 123138.

Susan Richter, doctor of History, professor, Department of History, Heidelberg University (69117, Germany, Heidelberg, Grabengasse 3–5; aud. 229)

Language: Russian

It is thanks to the Augsburgian copperplate engraver Jeremias Wachsmuth (1711–1771) that an emblematical figure of reformation has been handed down to us in 1758. Wachsmuth, in turn, complies with Cesare Ripa’s (1555–1622) riforma which the latter coined in his Iconologia overo Descrittione Dell’imagini Universali cavate dall’Antichità et da altri luoghi in order to anthropomorphically make goals, means, and actors of reform more graspable and more easily explicable, respectively.
Revealing itself in the form of a young woman, Wachstmuth’s reformation holds a billhook in its right hand. Serving as an horticultural tool especially in wine-growing regions, it is applied to the present day, for instance, in the act of fruit tree pruning. In this context, its functions as the perfect instrument for carefully cutting off back dead or diseased branches. The underlying idea is to control growth and stimulate the expected yield. Ripa correspondingly assigns to his personified Riforma both an example of a diseased and a healthy branch, each resulting from a particular course of action: on the one hand, the flourishing branch as the result of a reforming trim, the diseased one, on the other hand, as the outcome of ignorance and a refusal of acting. The knife, accordingly, symbolizes the principle of renasci (renewal) or, alternatively, the idea of revirescere (regreening and regaining strength). Thus, the billhook, in horticultural life, is supposed to assist a well-informed professional. The fashion how Wachsmuth puts this symbolic tool into use, provides guidance to a particular exegesis. For carrying out a correction of the status quo and striving for a change to the better, it is most certainly necessary to have suitable instruments at one’s disposal.
The ensemble consisting of book and billhook additionally indicates the necessity of able key actors being bestowed with faith, knowledge, courage, legitimacy, and, being of the utmost importance, agency. It is thus hardly surprising that the caption precisely hints at such an actor: The biblical king Josiah (647 BC – 609 BC, Destruit Iosias iustus, Simulacra Deorum, Rex populusque ferunt, pectora pura Deo) who is detectable in two scenes in the background of the picture. On the left side, sitting on his throne and internalizing the Divine Laws and, on the right side, acting correspondingly.

Key Words: Correction, Emblematical figure, Personification, Reformation, Reform

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-richter/

Creative Commons License

Die Begegnung Russlands mit dem lutherischen Protestantismus im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert

Angermann, N. Die Begegnung Russlands mit dem lutherischen Protestantismus im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 101122.

Norbert Angermann, doctor of History, professor emeritus, Historical seminar of the Hamburg University (20148, Germany, Hamburg, Mittelweg 177)

Language: Russian

This article looks at the presence of the Lutheran Protestantism in Russia from the Middle of the 16th century to 1689, the year of the accession to power of Peter the Great. The main attention is focused on the beginning of the Lutheran-Orthodox contacts. The author stresses the role of trade and the relationships between Russia and Livonia. Already on the eve of the Livonian war (before 1558) in Pskov there was a little parish of Russian Protestants, probably formed as a result of trade between Pskov and Dorpat. In the whole time under observation the Lutherans formed the biggest group of the Western foreigners in Muscovy. The author speaks about the services of the Lutheran military men, doctors, interpreters and other specialists for Russia. Above all owing to the utility of these persons the government gave to them a far-reaching religious freedom. With regard to the allowance of the Lutheran faith Muscovy had behind other European countries.

Key Words: Moscow, Ivan the Terribble, Lutherans, Reformation, heresy, tolerance

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-angermann/

Creative Commons License

Royal Officials in Reformation France: Is it Easy to be a Huguenot?

Altukhova, N. I. Frantsuzskie chinovniki v epokhu Reformatsii: Legko li byt’ gugenotom? [Royal Officials in Reformation France: Is It Easy to Be a Huguenot?], in: Proslogion: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Social History and Culture, 2018. Vol. 4 (1). P. 84100.

Natalia Ivanovna Altukhova, research fellow, Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences (119334, Rossiya, Moskva, Leninskiy prospekt, 32A), scientific assistant, Ecclesiastical Research Centre «Orthodox Encyclopedia» (105120, Rossiya, Moskva, Nizhnyaya Syromyatnicheskaya ulitsa, 10A, building 1)

Language: Russian

The article deals with the practice of venality (vénalité des offices) in France during the Wars of Religion in the second half of the sixteenth century. During that period the adherents of the so-called «reformed religion» could obtain or lose the opportunity to acquire and to perform royal offices, depending on whether hostilities prevailed or a peace was concluded — on conditions either favourable to the Huguenots or depriving them of the rights received during the previous war. The article examines steps taken to prevent «the heretics» from serving «the most Christian king» (oath of allegiance to the Catholic religion, testimonies of «a Catholic way of life», certificates from Catholic priests) as well as the royal legislation against Huguenot officials. While addressing Edicts of Pacification (édits de pacification), it is possible to reveal, on the one hand, the pendulum-like nature of royal commands, switching between prohibition and permission for Huguenots to acquire and to dispose of royal offices; on the other hand, a gradual, if very slow, process of obtainment by the Huguenots of the right not only to appeal to the Catholic king for justice, but also to participate in the work of financial and judicial institutions, executing offices acquired through the department of casual revenues (caisse des parties casuelles). The development of legal venality excluded the possibility to deprive owners, whether Calvinists or Catholics, of their offices without financial reimbursement. The implementation of anti-Huguenot edicts was thus delayed by the lack of money in the royal treasury. However, the Huguenots themselves, fearing for their lives and property, often preferred to conceal their relationship with «the so-called Reformers».

Key Words: French Wars of Religion, venality of offices, officials, Edicts of Pacification, Huguenots, France, sixteenth century

URL: http://proslogion.ru/41-altuhova/

Creative Commons License